Carrie Fisher 'Princess Leia' photocopied breasts (lost image; 1970s)

Lmwtan cleanup.png This article has been tagged as Needing work due to its informal/poor writing.

Nsfw.png This article has been tagged as NSFW due to its slightly lewd subject matter.

Carrie Fisher's photocopied breasts
A humorous behind-the-scenes image of Chewbacca groping Leia.
A humorous behind-the-scenes image of Chewbacca groping Leia.
Status Lost

Carrie Fisher's most renowned role is undoubtedly that of Princess Leia in the original Star Wars trilogy. Star Wars remain a cult phenomenon to this day and is arguably the most successful sci-fi franchise ever created. Having said that, it's not surprising that a lot of you reading this article already know perfectly well of the existence of the 1970s photocopies of Fisher's breasts that were created on the set of Star Wars.

For those unfamiliar with the story, during the production of the first Star Wars film (i.e.,. Episode IV), Fisher was told by writer/director George Lucas not to wear a bra, as "there wasn't any lingerie in space". She agreed, instead of having to tape her breasts down before filming, which spawned an in-joke between crew members, when Fisher jokingly suggested that "At the end of the day we should have an auction with the crew—whoever wins gets to rip the gaffer tape off my breasts". She then decided to take the joke a step further, by photocopying her breasts and having copies passed around to various crew members.[1]

It is unknown of any of these photocopies still exist; if they do, they're surely in the hands of the aforementioned Star Wars crew members, who will likely never see a reason to publicly release them.

References

Comments

NOTE: COMMENTS ARE TEMPORARILY DISABLED SITE-WIDE. FOR MORE INFORMATION, SEE HERE.


avatar

ApolloJustice

12 months ago
Score 2
We need to find this to honor her death
avatar

SwiftSLawliet

12 months ago
Score 0
No, that would be a dishonor to Carrie Fisher.
avatar

Piggyfan101

12 months ago
Score 0
Well this is just disrespectful.
avatar

Anonymous user #1

12 months ago
Score 1
Yeah, this would just be disrespectful now, it's best to leave things like this rest in the sands of time.
avatar

Anonymous user #3

11 months ago
Score 3
Yeah you're right :-D
avatar

Anonymous user #6

5 months ago
Score 0
definitely disrespectful
avatar

TheFoxy3D

12 months ago
Score -1
WTF.
avatar

Anonymous user #2

11 months ago
Score -8
This should be under NSFL because that lost image is inappropriate. Besides boys are not suppose to see it and other girls who are not authorized and this a private part as well.
avatar

Anonymous user #5

11 months ago
Score 8
Boy,you're an awful lot of fun.
avatar

Anonymous user #9

3 months ago
Score 1

"Besides boys are not suppose to see it"

Are you 6 years old?
avatar

Ryanskii

3 months ago
Score 1
Um no, hes smart
avatar

Idonom

2 months ago
Score 0
NSFL means that it will terrify someone due to the disturbing subject matter. NSFW means that it's inappropriate for people under 18 but not terrifying for them. NSFW is an appropriate tag for this work due to the slightly inappropriate subject matter.
avatar

Chuunibyou

1 months ago
Score 0
Are you a kid???
avatar

Anonymous user #4

11 months ago
Score 4
That's not what NSFL means. If anything you're being oversensitive about it being 'NSFW'. It's really neither, just slightly lewd.
avatar

LaptiNek

9 months ago
Score 2
RIP Carrie
avatar

KoolkatBrian

6 months ago
Score 0
this is officially the stupidest thing on this wiki
avatar

Vamp1597

4 months ago
Score 3
No, the stupidest thing on this wiki is the gay Jesus porn film, "Him".
avatar

Anonymous user #7

5 months ago
Score -2
Some media really needs to be found, While other should just be forgotten.
avatar

Anonymous user #8

4 months ago
Score 0
Dang, this is just, Wowzers
avatar

Ianolivia

2 months ago
Score 0
Wow, we've really ran out of ideas for articles, haven't we?
avatar

Kobochat

2 months ago
Score 0
This was added to the wiki in 2013
avatar

Thundermaster612

2 months ago
Score 0

"There's no lingerie in space"

Wonder if Disney kept that canon
avatar

Anonymous user #10

2 months ago
Score 0
My apologies if I come off as slightly rude, but does this really warrant an article?
avatar

Ryanskii

2 months ago
Score 0

Is it lost?

there is your answer
avatar

Anonymous user #10

2 months ago
Score 0

Technically, yes, you are right... I suppose I was questioning it because it's not really a form of media per se, and it's just a very weird thing to write an article about.

Ah, well. Don't really have an issue with it either way.
avatar

Vamp1597

1 months ago
Score 0
Pictures are considered media, they're just not focused on as much by the wiki.
avatar

Anonymous user #11

2 months ago
Score 0
Why does this exist!?

You are not allowed to post comments.

This site is best viewed at 1920x1080 screen resolution.
Powered by MediaWiki Creative Commons Licence