Max Headroom Television Hijacking (lost audio from first transmission; 1987)

Max Headroom Television Hijacking (first transmission audio)
A screenshot taken from one of the footages from the hijack.
A screenshot taken from one of the footages from the hijack.
Status Lost

The Max Headroom Television Hijackings was a 1987 incident in which a group of at least three people interrupted television airings on November 22 on two occasions and two different stations in Chicago. The pirate broadcasts involved a man wearing a mask of 80s pop-culture character Max Headroom. While speculation at the time suggested the hijacking was a form of protest or even a terrorist attack, it is widely accepted to be an elaborate prank. The hijackers remain at large.

The first hijacking took place during a news broadcast on Chicago television station WGN-TV (an independent station at the time, now an independent station again after having been a network affiliate in some sort between 1995 and 2016). Around 9 PM, a sports report by anchor Dan Roan was interrupted by a distorted, shaking background, an ominous buzzing noise, and the face of a man in a Max Headroom mask. The noise was likely due to a failure to hijack the station's audio frequencies. The intrusion ended thirty seconds later. Roan returned to the screen, saying, "Well, if you're wondering what just happened, so am I."

The second hijacking took place around 11:15 on WTTW (a PBS station) during an airing of the Doctor Who serial Horror of Fang Rock. This time, the hijackers were able to successfully transmit their message, albeit with heavily distorted audio. Max mutters pop cultural phrases like "Catch the wave" (the catchphrase of New Coke, for which the real Headroom was then spokesperson) and "Your love is fading" (possibly a reference to The Temptations song "(I Know) I'm Losing You"). He also hums the "Clutch Cargo" theme song and states "I still see the X!", a direct reference to the final episode of "Clutch Cargo." After just over a minute of seemingly meaningless non-sequiturs, the footage jump cuts to an image of Max bent over, his rear exposed in side view, while a woman in a French maid costume spanks him with a flyswatter.

Speculation

The incident was largely decried as immature and even obscene. Immediately after the hijacking, widespread media coverage suspected the hijacking was a protest of the then-recent rise of premium cable channels using satellite encryption to prevent non-subscribers from viewing their offerings. The hijackers may have been using the incident as an early form of cyber terrorism to prove that the new encryption methods were not foolproof. Premium cable channels assured subscribers that they did not need to fear similar interruptions, and though concerns continued that the hijackers would strike again, the incident was not repeated.

On 10 November 2010, a Reddit poster claimed to know the persons behind the hijacking incident. In 2013, a follow-up to the discussion from Reddit's Chicago forum verified the original poster's details and confirmed the story. Working with these two posters, Chris Knittel of Vice and Motherboard wrote a complete article with additional research that confirms the veracity of the two anonymous posters' stories, leading to the conclusion that the mystery has been solved. The names of the perpetrators, however, have never been revealed.

Surviving Media

The first hijacking was not recorded due to not many people recording the broadcast at the time. On the 22nd of November 2017, The Museum of Classic Chicago Television, a online museum dedicated to the preservation of programming from the Chicago area, uploaded a copy of the first transmission to their Youtube channel. Due to Doctor Who fans regularly taping the episode airings, many copies of the second hijacking survive in full.

The hijacking was done by pre-recorded video, as proved by the jump cut from the second broadcast, meaning that audio from the first broadcast may still be in possession of the hijackers. Since leaking the tapes risks revealing their identities, it is unlikely that this original video will ever see the light of day. Contemporary and current speculation suggests the two hijackings both used the same footage. However, it is difficult to definitively compare the two clips.

Gallery

The first transmission.
The second transmission.

Comments

NOTE: COMMENTS ARE TEMPORARILY DISABLED SITE-WIDE. FOR MORE INFORMATION, SEE HERE.


avatar

Anonymous user #1

18 months ago
Score 1
Max headroom is it The new Coca-Cola campaign (in 1987)
avatar

Anonymous user #2

17 months ago
Score 2
It's still unexplained but this is creepy. But I saw that on tv I was in complete shock because I was watching football series and suddenly it got hacked. I never saw the dr who hacking but idk but I find this creepy and unexplained.
avatar

Anonymous user #4

12 months ago
Score -9
Uh, it only interrupted Dr. Who on WGN. If you weren't watching Dr. Who, you didn't see it.
avatar

Anonymous user #6

9 months ago
Score 4
You didn't read everything. It was hijacked twice.
avatar

Anonymous user #3

16 months ago
Score 2
I was recording WGN-TV at that since I wanted to see it after I got back from a dinner. If I can find it, I will send a follow up message.
avatar

Anonymous user #5

10 months ago
Score 1
Got anything?
avatar

Anonymous user #6

9 months ago
Score 1
Well, they didn't say they would respond if they couldn't find it.
avatar

Anonymous user #7

6 months ago
Score 3
Legends are that Anon #3 is still searching that VHS in his huge mansion.
avatar

Shrek

5 months ago
Score 0
I find kind of scary, I find it kind of dumb. These stupid yet smart brothers got slapped in the bum.
avatar

FroopLoots

1 months ago
Score 3
Just letting people know, the Museum of Classic Chicago Television posted the REAL version of the first incident on YouTube on the 30th anniversary of the incident, 11/22/17. Still no audio, but much better than the mockup that's been available for years now. Check it out: https://www....=dKnwhokvgxE
avatar

SADLAD84

1 months ago
Score 0
Seeing as in the first instance it was the studio technicians that returned the signal to normal rather than Max himself, doesn't that mean there could possibly be more footage to the first intrusion that we have never seen?
avatar

Terry the Cat

1 months ago
Score 0
Most likely. We all know that the incident was pre-recorded. Probably twice. I'd expect the audio to be totally different from the audio of the second.
avatar

Terry the Cat

1 months ago
Score 1
By the way, statute of limitations expired a while back, so there's no reason for the perps to keep hiding. Let the whole story be known!
avatar

SADLAD84

1 months ago
Score 0
How do we know he's even still alive?
avatar

Terry the Cat

1 months ago
Score 0
Yeah, that would be a problem
avatar

Terry the Cat

1 months ago
Score 0
If they are still alive, why keep hiding?

You are not allowed to post comments.

This site is best viewed at 1920x1080 screen resolution.
Powered by MediaWiki Creative Commons Licence