Rules, guidelines and tips: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
ARTICLE CREATION RULES: | ARTICLE CREATION RULES: | ||
* | *Plagiarism will not be tolerated and will ultimately result in a ban for repeat offenders; the entire article must be your own, though direct quotes are accepted in most cases (as long as they don't comprise the majority of the article's content). | ||
*Articles should be written as factually and unbiased as possible; any articles that show obvious bias will either be edited or removed outright. | |||
*Articles should be around 500 words minimum, unless information on the topic is scarce. Longer articles are perfectly fine if there is an abundance of information on the subject; just try not to include an excessive or unnecessary content. | |||
USER CONDUCT: | USER CONDUCT: | ||
*All users engaging in flame wars, trolling, or any other kind of offensive behaviour will receive a ban; repeat offenders will be banned permanently. | |||
*Do not spam in an article's talk page; such behaviour will lead to a ban; repeat offenders will be banned permanently. | |||
Line 15: | Line 19: | ||
-Length: Length is not necessarily an issue, especially if there is a either lack or abundance of information on a certain subject, but, for example, if you create a one or two sentence article for a subject of which significantly more information is widely-known, expect said article to be either rewritten or removed. The same goes for long articles; some long articles can absolutely be justified, due to the sheer extent of information available on a subject - try not to waffle on too much though. | -Length: Length is not necessarily an issue, especially if there is a either lack or abundance of information on a certain subject, but, for example, if you create a one or two sentence article for a subject of which significantly more information is widely-known, expect said article to be either rewritten or removed. The same goes for long articles; some long articles can absolutely be justified, due to the sheer extent of information available on a subject - try not to waffle on too much though. | ||
-Relevance: If you wish to create an article for a piece of lost media, said media must be relevant enough to warrant a mention (eg. if someone's YouTube uploads go missing, and they are not famous or noteworthy, then they don't belong here on the wiki). | -Relevance: If you wish to create an article for a piece of lost media, said media must be relevant enough to warrant a mention (eg. if someone's YouTube uploads go missing, and they are not famous or noteworthy, then they don't belong here on the wiki). | ||
Revision as of 12:08, 2 January 2015
ARTICLE CREATION RULES:
- Plagiarism will not be tolerated and will ultimately result in a ban for repeat offenders; the entire article must be your own, though direct quotes are accepted in most cases (as long as they don't comprise the majority of the article's content).
- Articles should be written as factually and unbiased as possible; any articles that show obvious bias will either be edited or removed outright.
- Articles should be around 500 words minimum, unless information on the topic is scarce. Longer articles are perfectly fine if there is an abundance of information on the subject; just try not to include an excessive or unnecessary content.
USER CONDUCT:
- All users engaging in flame wars, trolling, or any other kind of offensive behaviour will receive a ban; repeat offenders will be banned permanently.
- Do not spam in an article's talk page; such behaviour will lead to a ban; repeat offenders will be banned permanently.
ARTICLE FORMATTING GUIDELINES:
-Length: Length is not necessarily an issue, especially if there is a either lack or abundance of information on a certain subject, but, for example, if you create a one or two sentence article for a subject of which significantly more information is widely-known, expect said article to be either rewritten or removed. The same goes for long articles; some long articles can absolutely be justified, due to the sheer extent of information available on a subject - try not to waffle on too much though.
-Relevance: If you wish to create an article for a piece of lost media, said media must be relevant enough to warrant a mention (eg. if someone's YouTube uploads go missing, and they are not famous or noteworthy, then they don't belong here on the wiki).