1986 State of the Union Address (lost pre-Challenger disaster version of American presidential speech; existence unconfirmed; 1986): Difference between revisions

From The Lost Media Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 12: Line 12:


==Background==
==Background==
''Challenger's'' launch had by this point been delayed multiple times, starting in July 1985. <ref name=":0">[https://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs/rogers-commission/Rogers_Commission_Report_Vol1.pdf ''Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident'' archived by NASA.] Retrieved 24 Apr '23.</ref> In the days leading up to the planned Jan 28th launch, NASA's engineers had in fact recommended it be delayed again due to concerns over how the shuttle's solid rocket boosters (SRBs), especially the O-ring seals inside the boosters, would perform in the subzero temperatures of a winter morning. <ref name=":0" /> Despite this, acting Administrator of NASA William Graham, wary of a snowballing agency morale and PR disaster, decided to push forward. The O-rings did in fact fail, and the escaping rocket fuel subsequently ignited before the boosters could get clear of the shuttle. <ref name=":1">[https://latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-01-18-tm-5326-story.html ''Why Challenger Was Doomed'' by Joseph J. Trento and Susan B. Trento from the Los Angeles Times.] Retrieved 25 Apr '23.</ref>  
''Challenger's'' launch had by this point been delayed multiple times, starting in July 1985.<ref name=":0">[https://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs/rogers-commission/Rogers_Commission_Report_Vol1.pdf ''Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident'' archived by NASA.] Retrieved 24 Apr '23.</ref> In the days leading up to the planned Jan 28th launch, NASA's engineers had in fact recommended it be delayed again due to concerns over how the shuttle's solid rocket boosters (SRBs), especially the O-ring seals inside the boosters, would perform in the subzero temperatures of a winter morning. <ref name=":0" /> Despite this, acting Administrator of NASA William Graham, wary of a snowballing agency morale and PR disaster, decided to push forward. The O-rings did in fact fail, and the escaping rocket fuel subsequently ignited before the boosters could get clear of the shuttle.<ref name=":1">[https://latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-01-18-tm-5326-story.html ''Why Challenger Was Doomed'' by Joseph J. Trento and Susan B. Trento from the Los Angeles Times.] Retrieved 25 Apr '23.</ref>  


On the morning of the launch, Jane Mayer of the ''Wall Street Journal'' reported that President Reagan planned to pause that evening's State of the Union Address and direct the audience's attention to a screen showing "heroes".<ref> [https://archive.org/details/challengerreveal00cook ''Challenger Revealed'' by Richard C. Cook archived the Internet Archive.] Retrieved 25 Apr '23.</ref> A year later, in the book ''Challenger: A Major Malfunction'', author Malcolm McConnell stated that a NASA staff member told him it was common knowledge at the agency that the reference to 'heroes' meant the President was planning to call ''Challenger'' and interact in some way with her crew - in particular to speak to Christa McAuliffe, a New Hampshire elementary-school teacher who was serving aboard the shuttle as a 'payload specialist' (space-exploration-speak for 'passenger') as part of the Teachers in Space Project.<ref>[https://archive.org/details/challengermajorm00mcco ''Challenger: A Major Malfunction'' by Malcolm McConnell archived on the Internet Archive.] Retrieved 25 Apr '23.</ref>  
On the morning of the launch, Jane Mayer of the ''Wall Street Journal'' reported that President Reagan planned to pause that evening's State of the Union Address and direct the audience's attention to a screen showing "heroes".<ref>[https://archive.org/details/challengerreveal00cook ''Challenger Revealed'' by Richard C. Cook archived the Internet Archive.] Retrieved 25 Apr '23.</ref> A year later, in the book ''Challenger: A Major Malfunction'', author Malcolm McConnell stated that a NASA staff member told him it was common knowledge at the agency that the reference to 'heroes' meant the President was planning to call ''Challenger'' and interact in some way with her crew - in particular to speak to Christa McAuliffe, a New Hampshire elementary-school teacher who was serving aboard the shuttle as a 'payload specialist' (space-exploration-speak for 'passenger') as part of the Teachers in Space Project.<ref>[https://archive.org/details/challengermajorm00mcco ''Challenger: A Major Malfunction'' by Malcolm McConnell archived on the Internet Archive.] Retrieved 25 Apr '23.</ref>  


Extrapolating from this, some believe that William Graham had rushed the launch of ''Challenger'' over all objections primarily so that the dramatic 'American heroes' moment could happen while McAuliffe was actually in orbit. Graham had been working under Reagan since his 1980 presidential campaign, and as acting Administrator of NASA was noticeably eager to please him.<ref name=":1" /> However the Reagan administration has strongly denied any claims that they put any pressure on NASA to launch the shuttle on the 28th.<ref>[https://nytimes.com/1986/04/04/us/white-house-finds-no-pressure-to-launch.html ''White House Finds No Pressure to Launch'' by Gerald M. Boyd from The New York Times.] Retrieved 25 Apr '23.</ref>
Extrapolating from this, some believe that William Graham had rushed the launch of ''Challenger'' over all objections primarily so that the dramatic 'American heroes' moment could happen while McAuliffe was actually in orbit. Graham had been working under Reagan since his 1980 presidential campaign, and as acting Administrator of NASA was noticeably eager to please him.<ref name=":1" /> However the Reagan administration has strongly denied any claims that they put any pressure on NASA to launch the shuttle on the 28th.<ref>[https://nytimes.com/1986/04/04/us/white-house-finds-no-pressure-to-launch.html ''White House Finds No Pressure to Launch'' by Gerald M. Boyd from The New York Times.] Retrieved 25 Apr '23.</ref>

Revision as of 19:59, 26 May 2023

1986sotu.png

Photo of the House rostrum during the 1986 State of the Union Address. Pictured is President Ronald Reagan (front center), Vice President George H. W. Bush (back left), and Speaker of the House Tip O'Neill (back right)

Status: Existence Unconfirmed

The State of the Union Address is an annual speech given by the United States president to a joint session of the U.S. Congress near the beginning of the year, remarking on the relevant issues and events of the moment.[1] The 1986 SoTU was the fifth such address given by the 40th president of the United States, Ronald Reagan, on February 4th of that year.[2]

The speech was originally supposed to take place on January 28th, but was delayed after the America space shuttle Challenger broke apart 73 seconds into its flight that same day, tragically killing all seven crew members aboard.[3] Facing a stunned and grieving nation, Reagan opted to focus that night's Presidential remarks exclusively on the disaster.[4]

Some reports before and after the disaster claim that Reagan had originally planned to interact with the space shuttle crew at some point during the State of the Union Address, but these claims have been refuted by the Reagan administration and a pre-Challenger disaster version of the speech has never publicly surfaced.

Background

Challenger's launch had by this point been delayed multiple times, starting in July 1985.[5] In the days leading up to the planned Jan 28th launch, NASA's engineers had in fact recommended it be delayed again due to concerns over how the shuttle's solid rocket boosters (SRBs), especially the O-ring seals inside the boosters, would perform in the subzero temperatures of a winter morning. [5] Despite this, acting Administrator of NASA William Graham, wary of a snowballing agency morale and PR disaster, decided to push forward. The O-rings did in fact fail, and the escaping rocket fuel subsequently ignited before the boosters could get clear of the shuttle.[6]

On the morning of the launch, Jane Mayer of the Wall Street Journal reported that President Reagan planned to pause that evening's State of the Union Address and direct the audience's attention to a screen showing "heroes".[7] A year later, in the book Challenger: A Major Malfunction, author Malcolm McConnell stated that a NASA staff member told him it was common knowledge at the agency that the reference to 'heroes' meant the President was planning to call Challenger and interact in some way with her crew - in particular to speak to Christa McAuliffe, a New Hampshire elementary-school teacher who was serving aboard the shuttle as a 'payload specialist' (space-exploration-speak for 'passenger') as part of the Teachers in Space Project.[8]

Extrapolating from this, some believe that William Graham had rushed the launch of Challenger over all objections primarily so that the dramatic 'American heroes' moment could happen while McAuliffe was actually in orbit. Graham had been working under Reagan since his 1980 presidential campaign, and as acting Administrator of NASA was noticeably eager to please him.[6] However the Reagan administration has strongly denied any claims that they put any pressure on NASA to launch the shuttle on the 28th.[9]

References