User talk: Happy Brian: Difference between revisions

From The Lost Media Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
== Mario anime magazine ==
== Mario anime magazine ==
Here's a [https://page.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/n230220277 closed auction] of the ''Peach-hime Kyuushutsu Daisakusen'' magazine. Kindaieigasha (近代映画社) was never a manga publisher, but they did a lot of tie-in magazines (or ''mooks'', as they're usually called in Japan) for films and anime. If you look on the cover, it credits the editorial staff of スクリーン (''SCREEN'') and ジ・アニメ (''The Anime''), which was their cinema and anime magazine respectively. The magazine itself is nothing special (I've seen other auctions showing more of it). It's mostly just a screenplay transcript with frames from the anime. It's not really a conventional manga. [[User:Arkhound|Arkhound]] ([[User talk:Arkhound|talk]]) 23:17, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Here's a [https://page.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/n230220277 closed auction] of the ''Peach-hime Kyuushutsu Daisakusen'' magazine. Kindaieigasha (近代映画社) was never a manga publisher, but they did a lot of tie-in magazines (or ''mooks'', as they're usually called in Japan) for films and anime. If you look on the cover, it credits the editorial staff of スクリーン (''SCREEN'') and ジ・アニメ (''The Anime''), which was their cinema and anime magazine respectively. The magazine itself is nothing special (I've seen other auctions showing more of it). It's mostly just a screenplay transcript with frames from the anime. It's not really a conventional manga. [[User:Arkhound|Arkhound]] ([[User talk:Arkhound|talk]]) 23:17, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
** Thank you for informing me about this. I'm not really sure why people would confuse that screenshot of it as a manga and not just part of a magazine on the movie. Yet the 1986 movie was an anime after all so I'm guessing people are assuming that picture was part of a manga on the movie that doesn't exist. I just fixed the title of the article to replace the word "manga" with magazine. I hope you're satisfied. --[[User:Happy Brian|Happy Brian]] ([[User talk:Happy Brian|talk]]) 23:29, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:29, 18 December 2017

Hey, this page is intended to discuss with me about any edits I make to this wiki. Please be civil with me or I won't respond to you at all. I have some rules before you send me any message here:

1. Please don't send me any spam messages; I do not appreciate them and will be instantly removed on the moment I see them.

2. Don't send me messages that you are not happy with a specific comment I made on an article here; this is not what my talk page is intended for.

3. Don't send me libelous or hateful messages that accuse me of something I didn't do (such as accusing me of being communist because of something I said); I have a right to remove them for contributing nothing useful besides bashing me and I have a right to report the user to the admins.

4. Don't repeatedly send the same message to me over and over again; I can understand if this was due to a glitch with the user's computer (usually, it's simple to just delete the duplicated messages) but if the user is doing this on purpose, the less likely I'll respond back to them.

That's my rules on my talk page for now. Until then, have a happy time editing. Happy Brian (talk, contribs) 20:36, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Mario anime magazine

Here's a closed auction of the Peach-hime Kyuushutsu Daisakusen magazine. Kindaieigasha (近代映画社) was never a manga publisher, but they did a lot of tie-in magazines (or mooks, as they're usually called in Japan) for films and anime. If you look on the cover, it credits the editorial staff of スクリーン (SCREEN) and ジ・アニメ (The Anime), which was their cinema and anime magazine respectively. The magazine itself is nothing special (I've seen other auctions showing more of it). It's mostly just a screenplay transcript with frames from the anime. It's not really a conventional manga. Arkhound (talk) 23:17, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

    • Thank you for informing me about this. I'm not really sure why people would confuse that screenshot of it as a manga and not just part of a magazine on the movie. Yet the 1986 movie was an anime after all so I'm guessing people are assuming that picture was part of a manga on the movie that doesn't exist. I just fixed the title of the article to replace the word "manga" with magazine. I hope you're satisfied. --Happy Brian (talk) 23:29, 18 December 2017 (UTC)