Mickey and Minnie Mouse (lost unauthorized pornographic animated short film; existence unconfirmed; 1936): Difference between revisions

From The Lost Media Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
In 1936, shortly before Walt Disney's 35th birthday, his brother Roy encouraged Disney employees to hold a surprise birthday party for him, to which they agreed. Supposedly, two unknown animators decided that it would be funny if they were to animate '''a short of Mickey and Minnie Mouse having sex''' for the party. When the short was shown, Disney responded by feigning laughter before complimenting the quality of the animation and inquiring as to who had created it. Once the two animators came forward, he immediately fired them, then left the building. It has been claimed that he ordered the destruction of all known copies of the animation shortly thereafter. It is unknown if any copies of this short survived after this.
In 1936, shortly before Walt Disney's 35th birthday, his brother Roy encouraged Disney employees to hold a surprise birthday party for him, to which they agreed. Supposedly, two unknown animators decided that it would be funny if they were to animate '''a short of Mickey and Minnie Mouse having sex''' for the party. When the short was shown, Disney responded by feigning laughter before complimenting the quality of the animation and inquiring as to who had created it. Once the two animators came forward, he immediately fired them, then left the building. It has been claimed that he ordered the destruction of all known copies of the animation shortly thereafter. It is unknown if any copies of this short survived after this.


Many have denounced the short's existence entirely, as the first public recounting of this story was in Marc Eliot's 1994 Disney biography ''Walt Disney: Hollywood's Dark Prince'', a book which has caused a significant amount of controversy among other authors and colleagues of Disney for its inconsistencies and factual errors among other things.<ref>[https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/walt-disneys-illegitimate-birth/ Snopes article debunking the book's claim of Walt Disney's birth being illegitimate.] Retrieved 03 May '18</ref>  
Many have denounced the short's existence entirely, as the first public recounting of this story was in Marc Eliot's 1994 Disney biography ''Walt Disney: Hollywood's Dark Prince'', a book which has caused a significant amount of controversy among other authors and colleagues of Disney for its inconsistencies and factual errors among other things.<ref>[https://snopes.com/fact-check/walt-disneys-illegitimate-birth/ Snopes article debunking the book's claim of Walt Disney's birth being illegitimate.] Retrieved 03 May '18</ref>  


==Gallery==
==Gallery==
Line 14: Line 14:
   |service1    =youtube
   |service1    =youtube
   |id1          =r7tdc6lZpA4
   |id1          =r7tdc6lZpA4
   |description1 =A portion of a 1995 episode of documentary series ''Secret Lives'' containing a recounting of the event.
   |description1 =A portion of a 1995 episode of the documentary series ''Secret Lives'' containing a recounting of the event.
}}
}}
==Reference==
==Reference==

Revision as of 18:47, 29 July 2022

Nsfw.png


This article has been tagged as NSFW due to its pornographic subject matter.



Walt Disney Hollywood's Dark Prince Cover.jpg

Cover to Walt Disney: Hollywood's Dark Prince, which first recounted the short.

Status: Existence Unconfirmed

In 1936, shortly before Walt Disney's 35th birthday, his brother Roy encouraged Disney employees to hold a surprise birthday party for him, to which they agreed. Supposedly, two unknown animators decided that it would be funny if they were to animate a short of Mickey and Minnie Mouse having sex for the party. When the short was shown, Disney responded by feigning laughter before complimenting the quality of the animation and inquiring as to who had created it. Once the two animators came forward, he immediately fired them, then left the building. It has been claimed that he ordered the destruction of all known copies of the animation shortly thereafter. It is unknown if any copies of this short survived after this.

Many have denounced the short's existence entirely, as the first public recounting of this story was in Marc Eliot's 1994 Disney biography Walt Disney: Hollywood's Dark Prince, a book which has caused a significant amount of controversy among other authors and colleagues of Disney for its inconsistencies and factual errors among other things.[1]

Gallery

A portion of a 1995 episode of the documentary series Secret Lives containing a recounting of the event.

Reference