User talk:Kobochat

From The Lost Media Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Where is 'loseratfinding's plan for merging the 204385 doraemon dub articles into one'? I don't see it.--PannenkoekenNL (talk) 11:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Blue Bird

It's a reference to the fact that an admin on the Muppet Wiki refuses to tell anyone how he came into possession of a screencap from an extremely rare Sesame Street sketchBlueBird (talk) 07:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Okay, cool. Read the rules before you post an article consisting of only an extremely cryptic picture.--Kobochat (talk) 04:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Go For a Punch

I understand that my "article" was misformatted and did not appear properly as a subpage on my user page, but I don't see how this topic is not worthy for inclusion. It's a piece of "lost media" confirmed not to exist. There is also tons of attention brought to this subject so it is definitely notable. LostMediaSearcher (talk) 04:50, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Monster Jam World Finals 2000

would you please put the article you removed back up? i'd like to fix it up like i'm supposed to Skullzproductions (talk) 17:01, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi! just wanted to say you might want to update the notice board, it's June already and the notice board is still the one for May. sorry if this sounded rude and you can take your time if you want, i don't know how long it takes to make the notice boards so maybe this message is unneeded, just thought i should let you know! -Deathnipple6660

Noticeboard update

Hey there. Thanks for the new update for January 2020. Mind if you add the fact that all 49 episodes of Step Inside were recently found on YouTube please? I think Ryanskip forgot to add these to his list, and I don't want anyone trying to find something that has already been found! SpaceManiac888 (talk) 13:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

There are some times where I mention stuff that was uploaded earlier but slipped under the radar until now, but in this case it seems like every episode was uploaded around a year ago, which is long enough ago that I think it wouldn't quite make sense to add it now. The article reflects its found status so I don't think anyone will still be trying t find it. --Kobochat (talk) 17:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

I don’t think you got the email

So I tried to email you to see if two of my page ideas were eligible. I’ve done plenty of research on them and I think they are both lost.

First, there’s the show, The Robonic Stooges, which has an episode called “Curly of the Apes.” I watch the show on Kimcartoon and the version of the episode I found had stopped after the 2 minute mark. I knew this was odd, because the episode was about to cut to another scene, and Robonic Stooges episodes normally last 5 minutes in length. I also checked another website and it used the same video. I think this can be considered partially found now. And the show doesn’t have any home media releases.

The second subject is the website It was active from 2001-2018 and I checked the archives of the site. They have a lot of images, but then I found other websites showing that there were more images on the site. These images do not have previews, which must mean that they were deleted or lost. This is a paysite but I’m talking about the content you can’t view on the site because it’s lost or removed. If you put the site URL through the internet archive, then you can see previews and stuff for lost image galleries. (Em 19:46, 27 January 2020 (UTC))

You know what? I think I’ve found enough evidence that Curly of the Apes is lost. I just really don’t want to get another page deleted, but at least the articles are good quality (with sources and formatting).



SAK Channels

You can’t delete the SAK article, besides, everyone’s gonna keep finding SAK videos and recreate the article eventually, sure child abuse is a big deal, but everyone still cares about SAK videos and everyone’s still uploading them. You can delete it, but everyone’s still gonna archive them for all our sakes. Besides, if people keep fighting back, they might actually give up.--Spongebob123 (talk)

I can and I did delete it. I consulted with other staff before doing so as well. If the article gets recreated it will be deleted again, and if you're the one who recreates it, knowing that it's been deleted and should not be recreated, you will be temporarily blocked from the wiki.--Kobochat (talk) 19:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Well, I care and I want the SAK videos to be found. I don’t care about child abuse, everyone will still find a way to create a new SAK article. Besides, everyone’s still downloading SAK videos on other streaming sites and no one should stop progress. Besides, you took away the one thing I love and I need the SAK videos to be found. I don’t care about the reason and I don’t wanna be blocked, but you can’t take the SAK article away from me. GrigioGuy, nenefun4534, Myself, Even YouTube Graveyard have uploaded the SAK videos on and other sites. So, child abuse is wrong, But deleting the SAK article is even dumber. Believe me, we’ll all fight back against haters like you and I’ll make sure you never do anything like this again.--Spongebob123 (talk)

Genuinely baffled that you thought "I don’t care about child abuse" was a good thing to say here. If the "one thing you love" is creepy videos of young teenagers recorded by a known pedophile, I am at a loss for words.--Kobochat (talk) 19:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Okay, I care about child abuse, but it doesn’t matter, I‘ve been watching SAK videos ever since I was 6 years old and ever since I grew up, I loved them ever since. When I heard they got terminated, I wanted to make a difference by archiving SAK videos since I was 17 years old, even creepy videos recorded by Ian Rylett. Now I’m 22 years old, still finding SAK videos, even planning to use an app to download deleted SAK videos and before I had a chance to do that, You deleted the article, so now I’m heartbroken. I’m saying I want the SAK article back so I can download the deleted videos. Sure I care about child abuse, but we move on and focus on the positive. I already reported gmail staff about you and I want the SAK article undeleted so I can do my job. But I’ll have to take my work archiving SAK Videos in another way if that doesn’t happen. And I’ll report you to the Lost Media Wiki company if the SAK article doesn’t come back right now.--Spongebob123 (talk)

As the creator of the SAKs channels article, I have no plans on recreating it. It was deleted due to it being borderline child exploitation content. It had NSFL/NSFW warnings and did not need to be super detailed. The SAK archiving community will continue elsewhere on the web to archive the content. Nenefun4534 (talk)